Michael J. Schreyer

2010-04-05T07:09:00.001-07:00

Michael was appointed by the governor of Maryland to the State Workers` Compensation Advisory Committee on Budget. His appointment was just confirmed by the Senate.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

Finding consolation in an accidental death.

2009-12-30T12:59:00.001-08:00

Friends and family facing the loss of loved ones in automobile collisions, medical malpractice errors, defective product malfunctions, or workplace disasters are often at a loss for how to put their lives back together. Such losses are nearly inconsolable. This video shows a man who lost his wife and son in an automobile accident several years ago. A priest, now known to us as St. Josemaría, wished to help him with some consoling words. Faced with such pain, St. Josemaría would ask God, “Why”? (Video 0:1:48).

Who should I hire for legal representation against WMATA for the Washington DC METRO train crash?

2009-07-01T14:03:00.001-07:00

Experience, location and convenience are the keys to hiring the right injury lawyer for your claim resulting from physical injury, death or post traumatic stress from the June 22, 2009 crash of the METRO red line trains. by Michael J. Schreyer

Experience in handling mass torts, or multi-party injury cases.

Injured MD & DC citizens should choose a law firm that has experience in mass torts involving dozens or hundreds of victims, from many locations. In September 1988 I was beginning the practice of law in the Greater Washington DC area. On the 9th of that month, there was a catastrophe in a Maryland High School Gym, when a set of bleachers collapsed and almost 100 students suffered serious injuries. My job was to litigate with two senior lawyers until we had gathered the facts and evidence we needed to compensate all of the students. With the three of us working around the clock for weeks and months on end, we were able to force a settlement so large that the manufacturer of the bleachers had the agreement sealed to protect the company's reputation. The experience that comes from working through all of those claims against a huge out of state company has given me the skills to win against METRO in this current catastrophe.

Location - can you find a lawyer whose firm practices in DC & MD?

Adding to the challenge of finding an experienced lawyer is the challenge of finding one that practices wherever the court requires it to be tried. Since the METRO crash happened in DC, that might mean a DC lawyer. But many cases against METRO are filed in Maryland state and federal courts. You will need to discuss with your firm, its ability to file in all state an federal courts in the greater Washington DC region. Don't settle for a lawyer who will file the case where it is convenient for them. Ask them why it should not be filed in each of the other courts in the region. If you don't get a smart, clear, logical answer, then you haven't found the lawyer you need.

Convenience - can you find a lawyer near you, who has the experience and abiltiy to file in multiple courts?

Adding to the challenge of finding an experienced lawyer is the challenge of finding that lawyer near your home. Being injured means facing difficulties with travel and with financial demands at home. What you need when looking for a lawyer is someone who you can see and meet at your convenience, and that means someone nearby. When looking for a lawyer, you should be looking near home. And that should not mean sacrificing experience. michael.schreyer@vzw.blackberry.net

Metro Train Crash Tragedy

2009-06-23T14:12:00.000-07:00

In response to the tragedy Monday evening here, I wanted to do something to help my local community. Of course I am not a first responder or a medical doctor, so other than taking my hat off to those heroes, there is little that I can do in the short term to provide aide or comfort. What I can add here is some legal insight to those connected to the tragedy who are ready to consider the legal aspects of their losses. Some short notes from recent wrongful death cases are listed below.

Wrongful death claims are often brought by spouses, children and parents, for their losses. A separate legal claim known to lawyers as a survival claim represents the loss suffered by the person who has died, and it is brought by the personal representative of the estate.

In a wrongful death case, the person who has suffered the loss of a family member must prove: that METRO or another defendant negligently caused the death of decedent. Weimer v. Hetrick, 309 Md. 536, 547 (1987). In addition the plaintiff must meet the law's definition of a beneficiary and the case must be filed within what is known as the statute of limitations, 3 years in Maryland. Md. Cts & Jud. Proc. Art. § 3-904.

In a similar fashion, the personal representative of the estate must prove that METRO or another defendant negligently caused the decedent’s injuries, and, to claim damages for pain and suffering, the estate must show that there was a degree of consciousness before death. Tri-state Poultry Coop. v. Carey, 190 Md. 116, 125 (1948).

For further information, please contact Michael J. Schreyer about his firm's cases against METRO. Michael.Schreyer@vzw.blackberry.net 301-861-5070.

Rockford IL Train Derailment Injury Cases

2009-06-20T12:02:00.000-07:00

The news out of Illinois today is tragic. At least one life has been lost at the scene, due possibly to excessive speed for the wet conditions. This tragedy will need prompt investigation by several independent investigators to determine what the appropriate speed was for the conditions and what precautions should have been in place to prevent the train from derailing.

Often in cases like this our litigators have engineers at the scene within 24 - 72 hours, to preserve evidence and build the case from the ground up. Many intersection cases involving trains can also be lost by a failure to quickly gather this evidence. By contrast the insurer and claims team for the railroad are likely on the scene now. They may be collecting photographic, video and witness information.

At trial there may well be a team of defense experts in addition to this initial investigative team. The result may well be a legal battle of experts, and a jury left to determine which group is most credible and objective.

Workers' Compensation - benefits for preexisting disabilities

2009-06-19T07:52:00.001-07:00

I just returned from a hearing with the Maryland Workers' Compensation Commission, and I want to share something that many attorneys overlook when preparing for the final hearing on permanent injury compensation. Many of those who I represent have preexisting disabilities. Most attorneys who represent disabled workers know that in serious injury cases the WCC will award benefits for preexisting disabilities, including disabilities that are aggravated by the injury and those that are not. But some of these disabilities are overlooked.

The case I had today is a good example. My client had a bad back injury that resulted in her losing her job and suffering a significant physical impairment of her daily activities. In addition she had an obvious difficulty in understanding basic information. I hired a consultant to test her and we found a learning disability. This will likely result in a doubling of the value of the benefits she will receive. Similar cases to this include those where injured workers have worn glasses, had high blood pressure and diabetes.

The answer to these cases really comes down to preparation, careful, thorough preparation. And the results show the fruits of that work.

Raven's retired McCray won, then lost $33.6 Milion in court this week.

2009-06-10T14:34:00.000-07:00

Michael McCrary won a $33.6 million damage award last year. But his former business associates had that result overturned by Maryland's intermediate appellate court Monday. Far from being the end of the case, the court sent the case back to Baltimore City Circuit Court for a new trial on damages.

The appellate court decided a Baltimore City Circuit Judge failed to follow proper procedures in holding McCrary's business associate in contempt, and found that her ruling was an abuse of judicial discretion in not allowing the defense to contest the alleged damages.

The suit was filed in February 2007, a year and a half after Hurricane Katrina interrupted renovation of an old downtown New Orleans office building. McCrary alleged defendants had secretly pocketed millions of dollars in insurance proceeds. The June 2008 verdict awarded McCrary $15.8 million in compensatory damages and the same in punitive damages without any of the defendants in court to defend the claim for damages.

The FDA Doesn't Provide Consumers with Injury Protection

2009-06-09T12:16:00.001-07:00

You would have heard some heated comments between Energy and Commerce Committee chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif., Rep. Steve Buyer, R-Indiana, had you tuned into the debate over a new law to provide legal remedies where medical devices only meet minimum governmental standards. Waxman said patients should not be barred from seeking justice through the courts. The FDA's ability to protect the public has plummeted, said Waxman, because the agency is severely underfunded. Buyer retorted that Waxman’s reasoning was "bizarre logic."

Georgetown law professor David Vladeck, soon to be the Federal Trade Commission's consumer protection chief next month, said a recent Supreme Court's decision is "the worst of both worlds" for consumers. The FDA, said Vladeck, can't possibly assure that every medical device on the market is safe, and because of Riegel, consumers can’t rely on the tort system if they're injured by a malfunctioning device.

Can the Maryland Legislature take away your right to fair compensation?

2009-06-09T10:54:00.000-07:00

You may be surprised to learn that in this past session of the legislature, no less than 8 bills were submitted for changes in Maryland law that would have significantly or totally deprived some injured folks the right to reimbursement of their losses. The new laws, defeated by actions of injury advocates who spoke out against them, included special protections for improper use of medical devices, below standard medical care by some corporations, and some public activities of Montgomery County, Baltimore City and other local governments.

With the limits already in place on the payment of losses to injury victims, why do these challenges continue to surface? The answer is money. Those who are injured do not have the power of the large governmental interests at work in Annapolis. But that isn't the last word. Where offensive limitations come up, the injured are often heard when they speak out to stop the laws that limit their rights. Hat tip to MAJ http://www.marylandassociationforjustice.com/md/index.cfm?event=showPage&pg=AmicusBriefs .